Contrast essay on Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde Essay

The wave-particle duality of macrocosmkind, or the belief that the human mentality is made up of a substanti completelyy and evil part, has ceaselessly been a matter of great engross for many philosophers, psychologists and writers. Robert Louis Stevensons Dr Jekyll and Mr.Hyde is a unavoidable classic on the surmount for its portrayal of both nature in the persons of Hyde and Jekyll is efficiently drawn in the symbolic descriptions, and the significant critic that is made through the novel, which is the hypocrisy of the conjunction where image is more important than anything else, is still relevant today. Stevenson, in his descriptions of Hyde and Jekyll and their actions demonstrates how the good part of the human mind (Jekyll) is better, more positive than the darker angiotensin-converting enzyme, the innate evil, embody by Hyde, which is harmful for society and the individual.First, the physical appearance tells us a lot active Hyde and Jekyll and, at the same time, wh at the author thinks about the cardinal parts of the human mind. Jekyll is tall, handsome and well-built a large well-made, smooth-faced man of fifty () with every mark of capacity and kindness. His hands atomic number 18 large, firm, white and comely. In the descriptions made by observers, Jekyll appears to be a perfect, secern gentlemen. The good part of the human mind is and then comprehend as eminent, more distinguished than the other part. Indeed, Stevenson reinforces this position with Hydes physiognomy. Hyde, is seen by other people who meet him as a dangerous and wonderful beast. Although they cannot name why, Hyde appears to those who meet him as repulsively ugly.He is younger than Jekyll still he is ape- manage and dwarfish and withal much smaller than Jekyll, for instance Jekylls clothes dont fit him. As the vivify says in his statement, his counterpart was less(prenominal) robust and less developed. Utterson even says divinity bless me, the man is hardly human and adds that Hyde looks like a cave dweller Hydes hands atomic number 18 not at all like the doctors hands It was lean, corded ()of a dusky pallor, and thickly shaded with a swart growth of hair. Stevenson, through his symbolic practice session of hair and small stature in his description of Hyde shows that this iodine is less developed and less distinguished than Jekyll. The good part of the human mind, incorporated by Jekyll is superior to the evil one, less developed and less attractive.Second, the place setting is very relevant to the theme and tells us a lot about the differences between Hyde and Jekyll. The story takes place in Victorian London, in the latterly nineteenth century, on a background of middle-class gentlemen who respect the grade of respectability and the dynamic of the Victorian society. Knowing this, we see with the descriptions in the novel, that the doctor is more successful than Hyde. Dr Jekylls place faces onto a squargon of ancient, noble and han dsome houses. Utterson even talks about the hall as the pleasantest style in London, describing it as a comfortable and warmed by a bright open fire. Even the butler, Poole, who opens the door, is said to be a well-dressed, loyal, elder and respectable servant.On the other hand, Hydes house is situated in the foggy quarter of Soho looks like a territory of some city in a nightmare and is surrounded by a dingy neighbourhood, ragged children and wicked looking women. Hyde, when going to Jekylls house, enters by the lower storey shabby door that faces on a different and dirty street It bore in every let the marks of prolonged and sordid negligence () was blistered and stained. Jekyll, in his buy the farm statement, describes the Hydes housekeeper as a unscrupulous creature. Thus, according to the Victorian values, no doubt that Jekyll has, in the novel, a larger amount of ethic than Hyde and therefore is more respectable. Hence, Stevenson demonstrates, with the different places whe re the action takes place, how Jekyll is superior to Hyde.We see in the behaviour and actions of Hyde and Jekyll how the latter one is better but also how the former one is despicable. Henry Jekyll is a doctor, the caring job among all. He is wealthy, having over a quarter of a million sterling at the time and as he says in his narrative at the end he is well-jazzn and highly considered. His friends, such as Utterson and Lanyon, are all respectable and ingenuous gentlemen who cherish honest hopes. His occupations, which are set forth this way The doctor gave one of his pleasant dinners to some five or six old cronies, all intelligent reputable man, and all judges of good wine are all worthy and reputable at the time. He also has always do good things for the society, and had always been known for charities () and no less distinguished for religion.Throughout the novel, he always tries to undo the evil done by his other nasty part, Hyde. If the doctor does so, Hyde does exactly the opposite.Right from the beginning, we know that Hyde hangs around in the dirty areas of London, seeking undignified pleasures and immersing himself into depravity, vices and sins. His acts are described by Jekyll as inherently malign and villainous. His depravity and sinfulness are also underlined by the different ghastly crimes, pickings force back at innocent people, he commits. He first tramples a picayune girl and leaves her ill-treated, crying on the street and then beats to terminal a old man. We see that Hyde is not barely less developed and more primitive in his actions than Jekyll, but also that these very actions are harmful for the society and lead to the destruction of the individual, as the author demonstrates when Jekyll in conclusion commits suicide.In conclusion, Stevenson demonstrates through the physical appearances, the setting and the actions of his characters how the evil part of our mind is smaller and weaker than the good one. By showing how Hyde is much smaller than Jekyll and by showing that the places and the frequentations he has are less respectable than those of Jekyll, he demonstrates the favourable position of Jekyll and therefore, the superiority of the good side over the evil one. Stevenson illustrates this by stating understandably the differences between Hyde and Jekyll, the evil and good side. The dark one is not only smaller, weaker and less distinguished but also leads to the destruction of the society and the individual. Stevenson also explores how the repression of the Victorian society leads to the release of that dark side, due to the will to muffle free from the value of respectability. Thus, we can ask ourselves if this value and the dynamic of repression that was taking place at that time werent partly responsible of the crimes that were affiliated in the Victorian era.